Book Review: Shoeless Joe
Jackson and Ragtime Baseball
Book Review: Shoeless Joe Jackson and Ragtime
Baseball
by Jonathan Leshanski
March 14, 2003
Shoeless Joe Jackson and Ragtime Baseball
By Harvey Frommer
Taylor Publishing Co.
P. 225
No surprise what this book is about. Shoeless Joe Jackson is a legend
of mythical proportions. Called by many including Cobb, Williams and Ruth
the greatest natural hitter of all time, Jackson was thrown out of baseball
as one of the Chicago Black Sox involved in the 1919 World Series fix.
Perhaps he is best remembered today as the player who was first to the
field in the movie Field of Dreams, adapted from W.P. Kinsellas
book Shoeless Joe (very soon to be reviewed on these pages
- Ive actually finished it, just havent gotten to the review).
He is also a central figure in many other works of fiction and/or fact
including The Natural, Eight Men Out and many
others.
Those works tend to portray Joe as a sympathetic character who was the
dupe of teammates and gamblers. Perhaps he was, and most of us whove
read about the character of Shoeless Joe feel that Jackson
got a raw deal. Its likely he was a dupe, and the statistics that
Jackson put up in the series that year belie any accusation that he was
trying to throw the series.
Shoeless Joe and Ragtime Baseball is about Joe Jackson and
the Black Sox, but mostly its about Jackson. It follows his career
from childhood to the end of his life. It also chronicles the events going
on about those times and how they affected baseball. Important in this
work is the understanding one gets of White Sox owner Charles Comisky,
American League President Ban Johnson, and the first commissioner Kenesaw
Mountain Landis.
It was also important to understand the role of gamblers and gambling
in and on Major League baseball. Baseball at that time was rife with corruption
and many games were thrown. Even many players now enshrined in Cooperstown
were involved. Some of them were caught with incontrovertible evidence,
yet very few were really punished (In fact in Major League history only
36 men have been banished from the game, 28 for gambling).
The eight White Sox who were involved and later called Black Sox were
uneducated men who were manipulated into testifying. There was little,
if any, legal basis for their expulsion from the game. In a modern courtroom,
the case would never have been heard. Even then, in a crooked and corrupt
Chicago where influence peddling was common, the ballplayers were not
convicted of wrongdoing. Nor were any of the gamblers who arranged the
fix.
Were the games thrown? Yes, I think there is little doubt of that. Was
there a conspiracy to lose the series? Yes, without question. Upon looking
at the trial and reading the transcripts, there was plenty of evidence,
although much of it illegally obtained. It shows that the fix happened
and that Jackson knew of it.
The author is sympathetic to Jackson and there is a good deal of evidence
that suggests Jackson actually took no part in the plan. Still his name
was used, and he did get a payment, which he may or may not have used
to try to expose the fix by taking it to Charles Comisky (who is rumored
to be involved). According to Jackson he was rebuffed by Harry Grabiner
(who was a GM in all but name), who blocked him from talking to Comisky
and told him Go home, Joe. We know what you want. Even after
Jackson showed him the money and explained, Grabiner allegedly told him
to keep the money and go home to Savannah.
If that were true, then Jackson was either a hero trying to bring evidence
to light or a conspirator with a guilty conscience. In either case, his
grand jury testimony (included in its entirety in the book) clearly indicates
that he knew of the conspiracy before and during the series. That guilty
knowledge was enough for Judge Landis to ban Jackson for life, as
well as another player, Joe Gedeon (a second baseman for the St. Louis
Browns) who was at the meetings and knew of the fix, but never played
in the game.
In this light the Jackson ban was responsible, though Joe may have been
little more than an ignorant dupe who didnt understand what was
really happening. That is called into question because Joe was later a
successful businessman (although he was illiterate and could barely write
his name). Whether justice was truly carried out is questionable. In the
80+ years since the ban, his fans have tried to get him reinstated, and
the South Carolina legislature has passed a number of resolutions to try
to get baseball to rehear the case. The commissioners of baseball have
refused to reconsider.
As far as Shoeless Joe and Ragtime Baseball goes, give
it 2.5 balls and make it required reading about the dark days of baseball.
****Want to know more about the Black Sox Scandal? At Home Plate will
be publishing articles about it in the upcoming months - keep an eye out
for them****
Our Rating System is based on a four ball system as follows: One Ball: Average. It has something to say but is nothing special. Two Balls: Something men usually have - also means its a cut above
average, and worth reading/owning. Three balls: Stands out from
its peers and is highly recommended. Four Balls: More than just
what two men have when hanging out together, it means it is an exceptional
book that truly earns a walk - straight to the local book store to get a
copy.
Please
feel free to leave us comments on our forums or e-mail us at
mail@athomeplate.com
Have you always wanted to be a sportswriter? We did too! We
can always use writers, editors, fact checkers, photographers, graphic designers,
and web gurus to help us make the site even better. Come chase your dreams with
us. Click here for more information
Would you like to Exchange Links? Our links page can be found
here: Links