| |
Serious
Baseball: David Wright
by Frank
Bundy III
October 30, 2005
As I mentioned in the article I wrote about Chase
Utley about a week and a half ago, I enjoy making projections
on players. When the Utley article was published though, baseball
was still in the middle of its League Championship Series,
and I said:
I know the 2005 season isnt even over yet, and Im
probably one of the first writers making predictions on 2006, but
this is what I love to do
Now though, after the Chicago White Sox successfully capped off
their championship season with a 1-0 victory over the Houston Astros
last night, its officially the off-season, and its ok
to make projections; so Im in the clear.
Im almost jumping out of my seat to get started here, and
I believe Ive chosen a great player to start the off-season
projections in New York Mets third baseman David Wright.
I will be using the same methods I used to project a 2006 season
for Utley, on Wright.
First, lets have a look at every season in Wrights career
since he entered the Mets organization at the age of eighteen:
| Year |
Level |
Age |
AB |
AVG |
OBP |
SLG |
HR |
OPS |
IPD |
ISOP |
| 2001 |
R |
18 |
120 |
0.300 |
0.386 |
0.458 |
4 |
0.844 |
0.086 |
0.158 |
| 2002 |
A |
19 |
496 |
0.266 |
0.367 |
0.401 |
11 |
0.768 |
0.101 |
0.135 |
| 2003 |
A |
20 |
466 |
0.270 |
0.369 |
0.459 |
15 |
0.828 |
0.099 |
0.189 |
| 2004 |
AA |
21 |
223 |
0.363 |
0.467 |
0.619 |
10 |
1.086 |
0.104 |
0.256 |
| 2004 |
AAA |
21 |
114 |
0.298 |
0.388 |
0.579 |
8 |
0.967 |
0.090 |
0.281 |
| 2004 (Mets) |
MLB |
21 |
263 |
0.293 |
0.332 |
0.525 |
14 |
0.857 |
0.039 |
0.232 |
| 2005 (Mets) |
MLB |
22 |
575 |
0.306 |
0.388 |
0.523 |
27 |
0.911 |
0.082 |
0.217 |
This is what you call a phenom folks. Wrights only bad
season occurred at the age of 19 in A-Ball, and he still had a .367
OBP in 496 ABs!
To start figuring how hell perform in 2006, we will start
by looking at his IPD and ISOP numbers, as I always do.
Wrights progress in plate discipline is well displayed in
the graph below:
Remember, league average IPD is around .060, meaning that Wright
has always been above average in this aspect of the game. The only
time he dropped below this level was in his half season debut last
season on the big club. As you can see by his jump in this category
in 2005 though, Wright clearly has adjusted. He still has a little
ways to go though until he reaches his average IPD (.096) through
his minor league career. I dont believe Im going out
on a limb by saying the kid is only going to get better here.
Will he necessarily get better next season though? I actually think
that pitchers and defenses may catch up with Wright a little in
his third season in the league and he will stay around the level
of plate discipline he showed in 2005, which is still great.
Now, lets use his ISOP numbers to see how much raw power Wright
possesses. As we did with IPD, here is a chart showing Wrights
progress in ISOP:

Wright has clearly made huge leaps in this category, but has dropped
slightly since his 2004 season in Triple-A. Since I believe pitchers
are going to catch up with Wright a little next season, I expect
another slight downfall in this category, though hell still
be above .200, which like his plate discipline, is still great.
Lastly we must look at how David Wrights batting average is
going to progress into 2005. As Ive stated in earlier articles,
this is very hard to do, but the best way to make an attempt at
it is by knowing a players BABIP (Batting Average On Balls
in Play).
The League Average BABIP is around .300 and in 2005 Wrights
BABIP was .335. To put this simply, this number has to fall. I mean
it just HAS to. This high BABIP is something that
is absolutely necessary for individual great seasons to occur,
but not something that happens often.
Watch for Wrights BABIP to regress to the mean in 2006, making
his overall numbers suffer accordingly. With this educated guess
now made, I can now make a projection on Wrights overall numbers
in 2006.
My belief that pitchers and defense will catch up with
Wright a tad in 2006, combined with a regression to the mean BABIP
means his 2006 season will look like so (based on 500+ ABs):
.291/.371/.496 (.867 OPS), 23 HRs.
Thank you for reading. If you have any questions,
comments, concerns, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to email
me at frnkbndy@yahoo.com.
|
|