Thursday, June 20, 2013
At Home Plate
There's Still a Little Hope for Francoeur
Written by Justin Zeth (Contact & Archive) on July 22, 2009
  

I like to imagine the conversation in the Mets' front office went something like this:

Omar Minaya: For Hal Lanier's sake, how many outfielders can fit onto one team's DL anyway? The fans want my head on a pike, ownership's breathing down my neck... people are acting like it's my fault everyone on this god-forsaken team is coming down with everything short of bubonic plague. Aarrrgh.
Intern
: Mr. Minaya? Ryan Church's agent just called. He needs a couple weeks off. He's contracted bubonic plague.
Minaya
: That's IT! (kicks a kitten)
Kitten:
: (
Minaya:
I don't care what it takes -- my kingdom for anyone who can stay in the lineup! You, whats-your-name! Who led the league in games played last year?
Intern
: (looking at baseball-reference): Um... Francoeur.
Minaya
: Frank who?
Intern
: He plays for the Braves, but...
Minaya
: Whatever! Get Frank Wren on the phone right now! Get him!
Intern
: But sir, Francoeur doesn't hit any better than...
Minaya
: I don't care! Get him!

francoeur_jeff_2
Minaya: "One thing we like about Francoeur is the amount of games that he plays."
Jeff Francoeur sucks. Just to get the obvious out of the way. Even setting aside my dramatization, I'm certain one reason Omar Minaya made the move to acquire Francoeur -- and really, Mets fans, all he gave up was Ryan freakin' Church, so back away from the ledge already -- is because at least Francoeur stays in the lineup. In fact, aside from his brief and ill-fated demotion to AA last year, he's played every game since he came up to the major leagues. Granting that, given his bat is at or below replacement level, Jerry Manuel gains nothing tangible by writing his name on the lineup card every day, at least humor the man the comfort that comes with being able to count on somebody to reliably show up on time and with all four limbs still attached.

Not that it matters much; 2009 is a lost season for the Mets now. There are only so many games you can lose from your best players and still hope to compete. If Minaya acquired Francoeur strictly for having the stability (even if it's lousy stability) of one outfielder playing every day, he did no harm to the franchise at all for his effort. Actually, if you're cynical you might appreciate Minaya freeing up a boatload of presumably much-needed medical staff man-hours by making Ryan Church some other team trainer's problem.

Let's ask the interesting question: is there any upside left in this Francoeur character?

Yeah, actually. There's some. Not a ton, but some.

Let's say four nice things about Jeff Francoeur, shall we?

1. He shows up every day.
2. He's an OK glove in RF.*
3. He plays hard. Too hard sometimes (particularly with a bat in his hands), but hey, we're trying to be nice here.
4. He's young.

* Actually, Francoeur's glove is now overrated somewhat, probably because of the Ausmus Effect (if a guy obviously cannot hit at all, yet he's starting in the majors, people will assume his defense must be awesome even if it isn't.) Francoeur was an excellent glove through 2007, but his defense severely went south the same time as his offense did; plus/minus rated him #30 among right fielders next year, among the worst in the league. I don't know that he's that bad, but he's no more than average at this point. Still, that's something. He's not Carlos Lee out there.

That last one's important -- Francoeur is working on his fifth season in the major leagues, but he's only 25 years old. There's still potential for him to improve, and if he keeps hanging around he's probably going to randomly hit .310 some year in his late 20s, get 120 RBI and be commonly mistaken for a superstar. (That would be a very good time for whatever team he's on when that happens to trade him.)

But more than that, there's still some room for Francoeur to improve and become at least an average player again (as he was as recently as two years ago) and have a career. As badly as it stinks, it's not unprecedented for a young player to strike out a bazillion times before he's 25 and then figure it out well enough to become useful. For instance, Francoeur's top five statistical comparables through age 24, per baseball-reference:

1. Harold Baines
2. Gus Bell
3. Jeff Borroughs
4. Lloyd Moseby
5. Johnny Callison

Remarkably, all of those guys were good hitters at least for a few years. Even PECOTA lists among his top comparables Glenn Braggs, who had some good years with the bat (albeit largely as a platoon guy or fourth outfielder) and Joe Adcock, who could really mash.

Of course, that was before this season began; if he finishes 2009 as weakly as he started it, I suspect his comparables lists will become populated with guys who were out of baseball before they were 30. But his record does bear some similarity to quite a few guys who did figure it out, and we should at least wait and see what he does these next two and a half months, and perhaps next season too, before we go ahead and toss him onto the scrap heap of history. He's young and healthy; in addition to those being qualities the Mets sorely need, those are the qualities to bet on in the junk drawers of the futures market.

Francoeur is very likely never going to be a star, not even if, as I alluded to, he somewhere down the line hits .310 and fools a lot of writers. Even so, there's still some potential to be a useful regular, or failing that, a useful platoon guy (he still has a career .801 OPS against lefties even now), or failing that, a useful reserve. It's not time just yet to toss him onto the scrap heap of history.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
 

At Home Plate Podcast

To listen to or download the latest At Home Plate Podcast, please click here.
To subscribe, click the icon below
Podcast Feed

Donations

If you like At Home Plate, you could show your appreciation by donating a small amount to our team. Thank you very much!

Amount: