|
Thursday, September 09, 2010
|
|
|
|
Be honest. You read that headline, and thought, “Man, this dude is crazy. Pass on Strasburg? Really?”
Yes. But not because he hasn’t succeeded -- well, he wasn’t awesome in high school and really came on this year, but, well, whatever, he was video game good this year -- or that the scouts don’t love his stuff -- Keith Law rated his fastball as 80 on the 20-80 scale, which would equal Joba Chamberlain and Tim Lincecum. Stephen Strasburg has pretty much everything you want in a pitching prospect. His record is flawless. The stats and scouts agree, which is rare.
How much is too much for a talent like Stephen Strasburg?
But here I am, telling you, the Washington Nationals should pass on Stephen Strasburg and take Dustin Ackley or some other pitcher.Â
My reasoning is simple. Pitchers, especially young ones like Strasburg, are about as reliable for achieving projected greatness as New Coke. The wonderful Joe Posnanski laid out all the pitchers taken No. 1 since the 1970s. Not one ended up a star, and the book is still out on David Price. Â
With pitchers, the real obstacle to them becoming stars simply cannot be predicted, and that’s health, the one golden skill found among the very best in the sport. The Pittsburgh Pirates had no idea that Bryan Bullington would get hurt. The New York Yankees didn’t expect Brien Taylor to mess up his arm in a bar room brawl. Things happen, and pitchers are so fragile, so delicate, that injuries can not only ruin them physically, but mentally as well.
Let me address the Boras angle, too. He wants $50 million. I cannot blame him. Anyone who complains about players getting big bonuses obviously thinks that baseball is above the rest of the world. Because I’m sure all of the accountants would hate to set their own salary demands or actually be able to make market value for their performance. Yeah, that would stink. Maybe we’re just jealous of ballplayers, but trying to cap off the bonuses players can earn is just stupid and only serves to make the owners richer. I’ll stop here before we get too political.
Anyway, if I'm Boras, you are right I demand $50 million. If Strasburg were a free agent, he’d get that. The Draft shouldn't change that. If he is worth $50 million, and someone wants to give it to him, it's cool with me.
But if I’m the Nationals, I have to wonder something. How real are the chances that Strasburg ends up being worth that $50 million?
Want the truth? The odds are low. Real low. Young pitchers aren’t safe, especially ones who randomly find velocity, like Strasburg did. He didn’t throw nearly as hard in high school, and no, I’m not accusing him of steroids. It’s far more likely he cured a hitch in his delivery or actually lifted a dumbbell. But more velocity equals more stress on the arm, and despite all reports to the contrary, Strasburg wasn’t made by Skynet. He’s human, with human tissues, muscles and ligaments. Which means he’s no safer a bet to stardom than any other pitcher that goes in the first round on Tuesday.
I can see Strasburg succeeding in the major leagues. I can see him pitching some this year at the big league level. I can see him winning Cy Young Awards.
But I can also see torn rotator cuffs, Tommy John surgeries and a career with fewer than 200 innings pitched at the big league level.
It really could go either way.
So, I said the Nationals should pass. But they won’t, and maybe they can’t. I seriously doubt a team that used to be the Montreal freaking Expos has the guts to make a drastic move like passing on Strasburg. You see, even if the Nats told everyone that they “passed on him because of the risks associated with young pitchers,” people wouldn’t stop and nod. They’d accuse the Nationals of being cheap.Â
The Nationals aren’t the kind of team that can break a mold because we’re used to them sucking horribly, and generally, being cheap too. Teams like the Boston Red Sox can break molds because we know they employ smart people. We’ll be able to trust that the Red Sox aren’t just being cheap. Such a thought would not exist if the Nationals were involved.
But if the Nationals don’t take him -- which, come on, they are taking him -- I would applaud them. I’m fine with Boras wanting $50 million for his young pitcher. But I’m also fine -- more than fine -- with the Nationals taking Ackley and passing the switch to the Seattle Mariners.
They don’t have to take the risk.
This article was sent in Saturday for a Tuesday publish, and it appears that the $50 million tag was off. If the bonus money required is less than $20 million, I am in favor of the Nationals taking him, but if it’s over $20 million, they cannot do it.
Recommend article:
|
|
|
At Home Plate wants you
Do you dream of becoming a sportswriter? We always have room for writers, editors, fact checkers, photographers, graphic designers, and web gurus to help us make the site even better. Come chase your dream with us. For more information click here.
At Home Plate Podcast
To listen to or download the latest At Home Plate Podcast, please click here.
To subscribe, click the icon below
Latest MLB Rumors
Recommended Baseballsites
Baseball DVDs
At Home Plate Contributers
Donations
If you like At Home Plate, you could show your appreciation by donating a small amount to our team. Thank you very much!
|